Role and tenant boundaries
Administrative responsibilities are separated and company-scoped management paths use permission and tenant checks. Support access is intentionally narrower and does not provide employee impersonation.
Enterprise trust center
A procurement-oriented view of what CardIQ currently implements, what depends on deployment or contract, and what is not yet claimed or independently evidenced.
CardIQ distinguishes implemented product controls from contractual commitments and independent assurance. Buyers should not infer one from another.
| Area | Current status | Procurement interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Application security controls | Implemented controls documented | Review documented RBAC, MFA, audit, lifecycle, tenant-scoping and verification controls. |
| Hosting / data location | Deployment-dependent | Region, topology, residency and responsibility model must be confirmed for the proposed deployment. |
| SLA / RTO / RPO / backup commitments | Not implied by public documentation | Treat as contract-specific until formally agreed. |
| DPA / subprocessor schedule | Customer-specific due-diligence item | Request the current contractual/privacy package rather than assuming a public register exists. |
| Independent penetration test | No public independent-attestation claim on this page | Do not treat internal testing or repository tests as an independent pentest. |
| ISO 27001 / SOC 2 | No certification claim | Certification must be verified from an actual valid certificate or attestation before being represented as achieved. |
Administrative responsibilities are separated and company-scoped management paths use permission and tenant checks. Support access is intentionally narrower and does not provide employee impersonation.
CardIQ includes password/session controls, login activity, session revocation and administrator TOTP MFA foundations. Enterprise identity features remain subject to tenant configuration and documented availability boundaries.
Identity and security-relevant actions can be recorded for authorized review. Security alerts and impersonation workflows are company-scoped and availability may depend on plan or configuration.
Employee and company lifecycle controls can stop inactive identities from continuing to appear as active company-authorized identities.
Verification is company-scoped and deliberately narrow. CardIQ does not claim KYC, government-ID proofing, biometrics, deepfake detection, or guaranteed transaction authenticity.
The public documentation intentionally does not convert one deployment model into a universal hosting promise.
CardIQ operates the standard application service while customers administer company users, employee data, permissions and lifecycle decisions.
Where offered, isolation, region, operational ownership, support access, updates and service levels must be documented in the customer agreement.
Where offered, infrastructure responsibility shifts toward the customer and feature parity, support access, update process and operational obligations must be separately agreed.
The public Privacy Policy is the current general public privacy reference. Enterprise customers should reconcile it with the signed order, deployment model and any negotiated data-processing terms.
This page does not represent that a standard public DPA has been executed for every customer. Where a DPA is required, it must be reviewed and agreed as part of contracting.
Do not infer a fixed public subprocessor list from application code. The applicable service providers and data flows should be disclosed for the actual deployment and contract before procurement approval.
Procurement should separate technical controls from formal service commitments.
A customer should request the backup, restore-test, retention, disaster-recovery and business-continuity commitments applicable to the proposed deployment. No universal RTO/RPO is asserted here.
Security-event handling should be reviewed during enterprise due diligence, including reporting channels, triage, containment, customer notification obligations and post-incident review. This page does not invent notification timelines that are not contractually defined.
Repository tests, code review and internal security work are useful engineering controls but are not substitutes for a documented vulnerability-management process or independent security assessment.
Do not represent CardIQ as independently penetration-tested unless a current third-party report or attestation can be produced for the evaluated scope.
No ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certification/attestation claim is made by this page. A roadmap or control alignment is not equivalent to certification.
Customers remain responsible for determining whether their use of CardIQ and selected deployment model meet their legal, regulatory, sector and geographic obligations.
Confirm SaaS, dedicated-cloud or self-hosted scope and the exact production responsibility model.
Document storage location, integrations, subprocessors/service providers, retention and support-access paths applicable to the customer.
Agree SLA, support, backup/DR, RTO/RPO, incident notification, DPA and security schedules where required.
Request current pentest, certification, vulnerability-management and security-questionnaire evidence only where it actually exists; do not substitute marketing language for evidence.
This Trust Center does not claim ISO 27001 certification or SOC 2 attestation. Certification or attestation should only be represented when current evidence for the relevant scope is available.
No. Those commitments depend on the selected deployment and customer agreement and should be confirmed during enterprise scoping.
No. Automated tests, code review and internal security work are engineering controls, but an independent penetration test requires a separate third-party assessment and report for a defined scope.
Explore the CardIQ Identity platform or review the workflow from verification through identity deactivation.
See how CardIQ Identity works View pricing